top of page

About the issue in Europe

Although an estimated 100 million free roaming dogs (owned dogs and stray dogs) live in Europe, there are no governmental sterilization programs in none of the most affected countries, which would improve the situation greatly. This results in a constant flow of kittens and puppies to replace the dying adult population, and so the sad cycle starts again, year in, year out.

 

The lack of vaccinations means that parvovirus and cat flu are very common, and parasite born diseases such as Leishmanisis and Ehrlrichia are prevalent - all being potentially lethal illnesses, especially in sick and starving animals. Some diseases, including rabies, can be transmitted to, and are very dangerous to humans. Animals suffering with any of these conditions will rarely be offered any veterinary care, as few people bother to help them. 



None of the most affected European countries has made any serious efforts to curb the stray animal population by implementing neutering campaigns, and/or by informing their citizens about the importance to spay and neuter their animals and/or not to let them roam freely and mate as they wish.



Instead, they try - year in year out - to clean the streets from unwanted animals. Poisoning, although illegal, is common practice. Every year, tens of thousands of dogs are poisoned or shot in an effort by municipalities to rid their streets of the 'menace' of stray dogs. Some countries lock them away in municipal shelters that are real death camps for the animals. Out of the public eye, the dogs are left to starve. Many die of the consequences of injuries and diseases left without veterinary care. Countless animals die of thirst during the hot summers, thousands freeze to death in the cold winters. 



Every year, NGOs from all over Europe spend millions of Euros of private funds collected via donations to care for abandoned animals in numerous ways. They feed the animals, treat the injured and sick ones, they run private shelters and they try to find homes for as many as possible and above all: they organize sterilization campaigns to prevent that new animals are being added to this never ending cycle of misery and despair.

 

Tens of thousands of people come together on social networks such as Facebook, giving all their commitment and spending all their free time to clean up a mess created by a society that has no clue about responsible animal-ownership, that does not care about animal welfare nor animal rights, and governments that fail their responsibility:



  • to educate their citizens about the need to spay and neuter their companion animals,
  • to make spaying and neutering compulsory,
  • to prohibit backyard breeding and puppy mills,
  • to create laws to prevent that more animals are being abandoned,
  • to create laws that prevent and severely punishes animal abuse,
  • to make sure that existing laws are being respected and that those who breach the laws are being prosecuted and severely punished

It is the duty of any serious government to take care of the problems occuring in its country, such as it is the duty of the governments to pay for, and to implement neutering campaigns when it appears that its country has a serious stray animal issue resulting from lack of education, responsibility and - in the end - also from lack of appropriated laws.



Unlike developing countries that lack the necessary funds and the needed staff to implement massive sterilization campaigns, is this not the case for the countries discussed here. We are talking about countries of Europe, most of them member of the European Union where the necessary funds for sterilizations - which would amount to only a fragment of the gigantic amounts spent each year by these countries to fight the effect instead of the cause - should not be the problem. The problem lays rather in a lack of vision and will.

 

It is not only a blatant shame that these problems are not being resolved by those governments, but it is also a total non-respect and absolute dismissal of their legal obligation to compli with the European Conventions and Treaties to which they are legally bond as a member of the European Union and/or as a signatory of the European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals.

Animal welfare in Europe and the EU

As far back as 1979, the European Council issued its RECOMMENDATION 860 (1979) [1] on the dangers of overpopulation of domestic animals for the health and hygiene of man, and on humane methods of limiting such dangers, that reads:



 

1. Aware that overpopulation of domestic animals, particularly dogs and cats, constitutes a problem in several member countries, contributing, for example, to the pollution of the urban environment;



2. Concerned particularly at the health risk for human beings resulting from the existence of a large number of stray animals, which can act as carriers for dangerous infectious diseases including rabies;

3. Recalling the continuous activity of the Council of Europe in favour of humane treatment of domesticated animals, and particularly the drawing up of European Conventions for the Protection of Animals during International Transport (1968) and for the Protection of Animals kept for Farming Purposes (1976);



4. Conscious of the need to attack the human ignorance which is the root cause of animal overpopulation through school education and information campaigns in the mass media, centred on the life of the animals, their needs, their requirements and the resulting obligations for man, and also the risks of disease;

5. Recommends that the Committee of Ministers instruct the appropriate intergovernmental expert committee to draw up a European convention which should aim, in particular:



i. to control the trade in animals:

a. by imposing strict standards of hygiene and welfare for animal rearing and sale;

b. by imposing a ban on the import of exotic animals ill-suited to European climatic condition ;

c. by encouraging the trade to organise itself into national or international associations, with a view to drawing up an enforceable code of conduct;



ii. to control animal population:

a. by making registration and marking of dogs compulsory and possibly by imposing a special tax on all dog-owners living in built-up areas, exempting pensioners, the blind and owners of watchdogs;

b. by introducing free or subsidised sterilisation of dogs and cats;

c. by ensuring that when it is necessary for reasons of public health and hygiene to destroy stray animals the operation is carried out by qualified personnel, using humane and up-to-date scientific methods.





On 8 May 1979 (3rd Sitting) the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe recommended that the Committee of Ministers "instruct the appropriate intergovernmental expert committee to draw up a European convention".

 

The European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals is a treaty of the Council of Europe to promote the welfare of pet animals and ensure minimum standards for their treatment and protection. The treaty was signed in 1987 and became effective on May 1, 1992, after at least four countries ratified it. Adherence to the treaty is open and not limited to member countries of the Council of Europe.



Several countries (such as France and the United Kingdom) did not sign or ratify the treaty due to concerns by dog breeding association who opposed the treaty's ban on tail docking (§ 10.1 (a)) and on the cropping of ears (§ 10.1 (b)).

 

A review of the treaty performed in 1995 resulted in minor modifications of the text and allowed signatory states to declare themselves exempt from certain paragraphs of the treaty. Subsequently, a number of additional countries signed and ratified the treaty, making use of this commission by declaring themselves exempt from the prohibition of tail docking. No country that hock ratified the treaty made ​​any reservations regarding the other cosmetic surgeries prohibited by § 10: cropping of ears, removal of vocal cords, and declawing.



The Treaty of Rome, signed in 1957, established the European Economic Community. The Treaty is the legal base which is periodically revised to take account of institutional and policy changes within the European Union. The Treaty of Rome did not include a reference to animal welfare. In 1992 a declaration on animal welfare was annexed to the revised Treaty of Maastricht. A further revision resulted in the Treaty of Amsterdam which, thanks to Eurogroup campaigning, included a protocol on animal welfare requiring EU policy-makers to pay "full regard" to animal welfare when adopting legislation in a number of policy areas. The Treaty of Amsterdam became effective on 1 May 1999. In 2009 the text of the protocol was incorporated in the text of the Lisbon Treaty, as Article 13, which includes additional policy areas.  (Source: Eurogroup for Animals) 



The animal welfare protocol included in the 1997 Treaty of Amsterdam introduced a significant change, as, for the first time in European law, animals were referred to as sentient beings - able to feel pain and suffering. The Treaty of Lisbon, which entered into force on 1 December 2009, incorporated an article on animal welfare, which provides that:



“In formulating and implementing the Union's agriculture, fisheries, transport, internal market, research and technological development and space policies, the Union and the Member States shall, since animals are sentient beings, pay full regard to the welfare requirements of animals, while respecting the legislative or administrative provisions and customs of the Member States relating in particular to religious rites, cultural traditions and regional heritage”.

So we have four treaties, one European Convention and at least one relevant Written Declaration dealing with the protection of pet animals and the handling of stray animals. 

​​

The stray animals issue itself has not improved since 1979 but, in fact, became only worse.

Isn't it ironic, that most of the signatories of the 'European Conventions for the Protection of Pet Animals' have considerable and growing stray animal populations?



These countries are:

  • Azerbaijan
  • Bulgaria
  • Cyprus
  • Czech Republic
  • Greece
  • Italy
  • Latvia
  • Lithuania
  • Portugal
  • Romania
  • Serbia
  • Turkey
  • Ukraine (signed the European Convention for the protection of Pet Animals, but did not ratify it)



If these governments would abide by the rules of the 'European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals' there would be no so-called 'stray animals' in the first place. 'The Convention' clearly states:



Chapter II – Principles for the keeping of pet animals



Article 3 – Basic principles for animal welfare



1. Nobody shall cause a pet animal unnecessary pain, suffering or distress.
2. Nobody shall abandon a pet animal.



If these governments would abide by the rules of the 'European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals' the so-called 'stray animals' would be treated with respect and the problem would be dealt with responsibly and most of all: the number of stray animals would have dropped since a long time given 'The Convention' clearly states:



Chapter III – Supplementary measures for stray animals



Article 12 – Reduction of numbers


When a Party considers that the numbers of stray animals present it with a problem, it shall take the appropriate legislative and/or administrative measures necessary to reduce their numbers in a way which does not cause avoidable pain, suffering or distress.

a. Such measures shall include the requirements that:


i. if such animals are to be captured, this is done with the minimum of physical and mental suffering appropriate to the animal;
ii. whether captured animals are kept or killed, this is done in accordance with the principles laid down in this Convention;
iii. Parties undertake to consider:
iv. providing for dogs and cats to be permanently identified by some appropriate means which causes little or no enduring pain, suffering or distress, such as tattooing as well as recording the numbers in a register together with the names and addresses of their owners;
v. reducing the unplanned breeding of dogs and cats by promoting the neutering of these animals;
vi. encouraging the finder of a stray dog or cat to report it to the competent authority.



Article 13 – Exceptions for capture, keeping and killing


Exceptions to the principles laid down in this Convention for the capture, the keeping and the killing of stray animals may be made only if unavoidable in the framework of national disease control programmes.



Chapter IV – Information and education



Article 14 – Information and education programmes


The Parties undertake to encourage the development of information and education programmes so as to promote awareness and knowledge amongst organisations and individuals concerned with the keeping, breeding, training, trading and boarding of pet animals of the provisions and the principles in this Convention. In these programmes, attention shall be drawn in particular to the following subjects:


a. the need for training of pet animals for any commercial or competitive purpose to becarried out by persons with adequate knowledge and ability;


b. the need to discourage:


i. gifts of pet animals to persons under the age of sixteen without the express consent of their parents or other persons exercising parental responsibilities;
ii. gifts of pet animals as prizes, awards or bonuses;
iii. unplanned breeding of pet animals;
iv. the possible negative consequences for the health and well-being of wild animals if they were to be acquired or introduced as pet animals;
v. the risks of irresponsible acquisition of pet animals leading to an increase in the number of unwanted and abandoned animals

Other European countries with considerable and growing stray animal populations, but that are NOT a signatory of the European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals, are:



  • Albania
  • Armenia
  • Bosnia & Herzegovina
  • Croatia
  • Georgia
  • Hungary
  • Malta
  • Moldova
  • Montenegro
  • Poland
  • Russia
  • Slovakia
  • Slovenia
  • Spain

 

 

EU, when do you think it is time to act?

 

 

bottom of page